Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries maintains the highest standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process. All research articles published in this journal undergo full peer review, with the following key characteristics:
- All research articles are reviewed by at least two suitably qualified experts.
- All publication decisions are made by the journal's Editor-in-Chief based on the reviews provided.
- Members of academic and research institutions (both international and national) and experienced retired professionals provide insight, advice and guidance to assist decision making on specific submissions.
- Qualified editors provide professional and administrative support that allows the journal to maintain peer review integrity while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency.
Editorial Decision Process
- Editors will decide promptly whether to accept, reject, or request revisions based on reviews and editorial insight.
- Editors may seek additional reviews when needed and will advise authors when further review is required.
- Articles submitted directly to the journal will be fully peer reviewed by at least two qualified experts in the field.
- Editors assess whether submissions report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data.
Editorial Decisions
Editors make decisions based on reviewers' advice from among several possibilities:
- Accept - with or without editorial revisions
- Revise - invite authors to address specific concerns before final decision
- Reject with resubmission option - indicate that further work might justify resubmission
- Reject outright - typically for specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance, major technical/interpretational problems, or plagiarism/fabrication